|

Wang Baoqiang's pro-collar gold broom: I hope this is the last time [picture]

Facebook twiter Tumblr Reddit Google+ comment

1.jpg

Wang Baoqiang brought the golden broom: I hope this is the last time

“I'm sorry to say to the audience.” “I hope this is the first and last time.” When Wang Baoqiang took over the “golden broomstick” that symbolized the rotten movie, the audience was applauding for his courage.

Yesterday, the 9th Chinese Film Golden Broom Award Ceremony was held in Beijing. The award is hailed as China's "Orchard" and does not honor outstanding films, but instead selects the most disappointing films. Wang Baoqiang, who received “The Most Disappointing Director Award” for “ Buddies in India ”, appeared unexpectedly and became the first frontline filmmaker to receive the award in the history of “Golden Broomstick”. His bravery and sincerity have been recognized by his peers and netizens.

on site

The award is for respecting movies

Because the awards were the most influential rogues of the year, the "Golden Broomstick" held nine sessions, but few winners came to the scene. At yesterday’s award ceremony, the audience and the media did not initially know that Wang Baoqiang would receive the prize, nor did the guest seat in the guest seat. When the "Most Disappointing Director Award" guest honorees Hairong Tian and Teddy Chan announced the winning film, they joked that "The winner was our good brother." At this time, Wang Baoqiang quietly appeared on the side of the stage, listening to the old friend's joke, he exposed the iconic white teeth, smiling too hard.

Waiting for the host to ask "is someone coming to receive the prize?" and a loud "yes" breaks the embarrassment that nobody has ever received. Wang Baoqiang, who appeared in the pursuit of light, immediately attracted the audience's exclamation. When they were on the stage, everyone was applauding.

When expressing his acceptance speech, Wang Baoqiang jokingly said that he heard that this year's “Golden Broomstick” is fiercely competitive and that he can get a prize “very rare”. “I also know that Golden Broomstick is not a special honorable award, but it can spur I'm progressing. Why do I have to personally accept criticism from everyone, because I love movies, I respect movies, respect the audience, respect the seniors present here, so I must personally come to lead.”

Talking about the failure of "Buddies in India," he admits that "for the first time as a director, I really lack experience and there are many deficiencies." At the same time, I expressed the hope that this is the first and last time. In the end, he apologized to the audience: “Thanks to the 'Golden Broom' for giving me such an opportunity to let me say something to the audience, I’m sorry, this phrase has been in my heart for a long time. This time it is due to the viewers, I believe that after hard work and learning, I will certainly become a qualified director in everyone's eyes and will become a qualified film worker.” His speech was interrupted by applause on several occasions.

When the host kindly asked Wang Baoqiang's next work and wanted to help him publicize it, Wang Baoqiang refused. “Today is very sincerely accepting the award. There is no need to promote my new movie.”

attitude

Refused to receive awards for different reasons

This year, the organizing committee for the first time exposed the video of the winners when they contacted the phone. The attitude of the Chinese filmmakers in the face of the “Golden Broomstick” is also widely shown in the world.

The first one is rejected on various grounds. Zheng Kai won the most disappointing actor with LA HISTORIA DU UN AMOR and The Golden Monk . When the organizing committee called his agent, the other party hesitated at first. When the organizing committee asked if they could receive the award on the spot, they would get a simple and simple answer: “The 'male' was recorded and there was no time.”

Some winners will express their dissatisfaction with the “Golden Broomstick”. This year, Liu Yifei won the most disappointing actress by defeating Mini Yang and others with "One Upon a Time " and " The Chinese Widow ." On the phone, his agent directly asked: "Do you think who can get it? You gave such a prize." When the organizing committee said that the award is also an exchange, the other said: "I think the exchange will not be This way, this is a clear matter. How do you let the actors communicate?" He added that they "don't agree that this assessment is correct."

As a " bottomless rotten piece" that was ridiculed by audiences last year, " PureHearts: IntoChineseShowbiz " has undoubtedly become the biggest winner of "Golden Broomstick" and won the most disappointing film award. The film director Zhifei Bi and Wang Baoqiang also became The most disappointing director. Compared with when Wang Baoqiang received the award notice, he promised to accept the award, but Zhifei Bi also said at the beginning that he would accept the award and said “This should be the biggest award we have received”. However, after a few days, he took the initiative to contact the organizing committee, stating that his search revealed that the “Golden Broomstick” was highly influential and he felt that the award would have a bad effect or he would not decide to come. He also said that he could not agree with the selection of the award and thought that "PureHearts:IntoChineseShowbiz" was not so bad.

Reflection

Rotten negative impact is too great

Three of the most disappointing films of the year were "One Upon a Time," "Buddies in India," and "PureHearts: IntoChinese Showbiz." These three films not only captured some of the other “Golden Broomstick” single awards, but also became a microcosm of domestic bad films last year. "Once Upon a Time" is a typical example of a large-scale filming. "Buddies in India" is a testament to the irresponsibility of the director when he walks across the line. "PureHearts: IntoChineseShowbiz" is like a jumping clown, exposing the bottom line of some filmmakers.

“We have been commenting on commercial films and small- and medium-cost films separately, but the situation has changed in recent years. Some film production costs are low, but it is difficult to distinguish between large-scale and small-to-medium cost, so our awards are also high. Make adjustments, and all the films will participate together," said Zeng Nianqun, executive director of the awards ceremony and executive editor of the Youth Film Executive Handbook.

Some netizens had previously questioned that "PureHearts: IntoChineseShowbiz" has no name as an actor and is not a big production. The audience didn't expect it at first, and it was not appropriate to get the most disappointing movies. In response, Zeng Nianqun bluntly stated that the film was of inferior quality and the main creative person was not proud of it. He used various methods to hype, and claimed that he wanted to sue the website and netizens of the film. “The negative impact on the industry is too bad, so Must be criticized." He also revealed that whether the judges or the audience, the film has been a high ticket lead in the two rounds of selection.

In addition to awarding rotten films, the organizing committee also named the Top Ten Chinese-language films and outstanding individual awards. Compared with the ironic "Golden Broomstick" award, these awards are genuine praise. The top ten films of the year were " LoveEducation " " The Great Buddha + " "August" " Pathsoft ", " Old Beast ", " The Bold ", " Angels Wear White ", " MR.NO PROBLEM ", " Village Theater ", "29 +1".


No comment yet.